A longitudinal analysis of patient satisfaction with care and quality of life in ambulatory oncology based on the OUT-PATSAT35 questionnaire.
Identifieur interne : 001351 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001350; suivant : 001352A longitudinal analysis of patient satisfaction with care and quality of life in ambulatory oncology based on the OUT-PATSAT35 questionnaire.
Auteurs : Thanh Vân France Nguyen [France] ; Amélie Anota ; Anne Brédart ; Alain Monnier ; Jean-François Bosset ; Mariette MercierSource :
- BMC cancer [ 1471-2407 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte (MeSH), Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH), Analyse multifactorielle (MeSH), Chaines de Markov (MeSH), Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé (MeSH), Enquêtes et questionnaires (MeSH), Facteurs temps (MeSH), Femelle (MeSH), France (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Loi du khi-deux (MeSH), Modèles linéaires (MeSH), Mâle (MeSH), Méthode de Monte Carlo (MeSH), Oncologie médicale (méthodes), Patients (psychologie), Perception (MeSH), Qualité de vie (MeSH), Relations médecin-patient (MeSH), Résultat thérapeutique (MeSH), Satisfaction des patients (MeSH), Soins ambulatoires (MeSH), Sujet âgé (MeSH), Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus (MeSH), Tumeurs (diagnostic), Tumeurs (psychologie), Tumeurs (thérapie), Études longitudinales (MeSH), Études prospectives (MeSH), Études transversales (MeSH).
- MESH :
- diagnostic : Tumeurs.
- méthodes : Oncologie médicale.
- psychologie : Patients, Tumeurs.
- thérapie : Tumeurs.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse multifactorielle, Chaines de Markov, Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé, Enquêtes et questionnaires, Facteurs temps, Femelle, France, Humains, Loi du khi-deux, Modèles linéaires, Mâle, Méthode de Monte Carlo, Perception, Qualité de vie, Relations médecin-patient, Résultat thérapeutique, Satisfaction des patients, Soins ambulatoires, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Études longitudinales, Études prospectives, Études transversales.
- Wicri :
- geographic : France.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult (MeSH), Aged (MeSH), Aged, 80 and over (MeSH), Ambulatory Care (MeSH), Chi-Square Distribution (MeSH), Cross-Sectional Studies (MeSH), Female (MeSH), France (MeSH), Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice (MeSH), Humans (MeSH), Linear Models (MeSH), Longitudinal Studies (MeSH), Male (MeSH), Markov Chains (MeSH), Medical Oncology (methods), Middle Aged (MeSH), Monte Carlo Method (MeSH), Multivariate Analysis (MeSH), Neoplasms (diagnosis), Neoplasms (psychology), Neoplasms (therapy), Patient Satisfaction (MeSH), Patients (psychology), Perception (MeSH), Physician-Patient Relations (MeSH), Prospective Studies (MeSH), Quality of Life (MeSH), Surveys and Questionnaires (MeSH), Time Factors (MeSH), Treatment Outcome (MeSH).
- MESH :
- geographic : France.
- diagnosis : Neoplasms.
- methods : Medical Oncology.
- psychology : Neoplasms, Patients.
- therapy : Neoplasms.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care, Chi-Square Distribution, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Linear Models, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Markov Chains, Middle Aged, Monte Carlo Method, Multivariate Analysis, Patient Satisfaction, Perception, Physician-Patient Relations, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
In the oncology setting, there has been increasing interest in evaluating treatment outcomes in terms of quality of life and patient satisfaction. The aim of our study was to investigate the determinants of patient satisfaction, especially the relationship between quality of life and satisfaction with care and their changes over time, in curative treatment of cancer outpatients.
METHODS
Patients undergoing ambulatory chemotherapy or radiotherapy in two centers in France were invited to complete the OUT-PATSAT35, at the beginning of treatment, at the end of treatment, and three months after treatment. This questionnaire evaluates patients' perception of doctors and nurses, as well as other aspects of care organization and services. Additionally, for each patient, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and self-reported quality of life data (EORTC QLQ-C30) were collected.
RESULTS
Of the 691 patients initially included, 561 answered the assessment at all three time points. By cross-sectional analysis, at the end of the treatment, patients who experienced a deterioration of their global health reported less satisfaction on most scales (p ≤ 0.001). Three months after treatment, the same patients had lower satisfaction scores only in the evaluation of doctors (p ≤ 0.002). Furthermore, longitudinal analysis showed a significant relationship between a deterioration in global health and a decrease in satisfaction with their doctor and, conversely, between an improvement in global health and an increase in satisfaction on the overall satisfaction scale. Global health at baseline was largely and significantly associated with all satisfaction scores measured at the following assessment time points (p < 0.0001). Younger age (<55 years), radiotherapy (versus chemotherapy) and head and neck cancer (versus other localizations) were clinical factors significantly associated with less satisfaction on most scales evaluating doctors.
CONCLUSIONS
Pre-treatment self-evaluated global health was found to be the major determinant of patient satisfaction with care. The subsequent deterioration of global health, during and after treatment, emphasized the decrease in satisfaction scores, mainly in the evaluation of doctors. Early initiatives aimed at improving the delivery of care in patients with poor health status should lead to improved perception of the quality of care received.
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-42
PubMed: 24460858
PubMed Central: PMC3922727
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A longitudinal analysis of patient satisfaction with care and quality of life in ambulatory oncology based on the OUT-PATSAT35 questionnaire.</title><author><name sortKey="Nguyen, Thanh Van France" sort="Nguyen, Thanh Van France" uniqKey="Nguyen T" first="Thanh Vân France" last="Nguyen">Thanh Vân France Nguyen</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Clinical Research Department, EA 3181, Université de Franche Comté, Besançon 25030, France. nguyen_france@yahoo.fr.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Clinical Research Department, EA 3181, Université de Franche Comté, Besançon 25030</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="region" nuts="2">Bourgogne-Franche-Comté</region><region type="old region" nuts="2">Franche-Comté</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Franche-Comté</orgName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Anota, Amelie" sort="Anota, Amelie" uniqKey="Anota A" first="Amélie" last="Anota">Amélie Anota</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bredart, Anne" sort="Bredart, Anne" uniqKey="Bredart A" first="Anne" last="Brédart">Anne Brédart</name></author><author><name sortKey="Monnier, Alain" sort="Monnier, Alain" uniqKey="Monnier A" first="Alain" last="Monnier">Alain Monnier</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bosset, Jean Francois" sort="Bosset, Jean Francois" uniqKey="Bosset J" first="Jean-François" last="Bosset">Jean-François Bosset</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mercier, Mariette" sort="Mercier, Mariette" uniqKey="Mercier M" first="Mariette" last="Mercier">Mariette Mercier</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24460858</idno><idno type="pmid">24460858</idno><idno type="doi">10.1186/1471-2407-14-42</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC3922727</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001303</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001303</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001303</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">001303</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001303</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A longitudinal analysis of patient satisfaction with care and quality of life in ambulatory oncology based on the OUT-PATSAT35 questionnaire.</title><author><name sortKey="Nguyen, Thanh Van France" sort="Nguyen, Thanh Van France" uniqKey="Nguyen T" first="Thanh Vân France" last="Nguyen">Thanh Vân France Nguyen</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Clinical Research Department, EA 3181, Université de Franche Comté, Besançon 25030, France. nguyen_france@yahoo.fr.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Clinical Research Department, EA 3181, Université de Franche Comté, Besançon 25030</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="region" nuts="2">Bourgogne-Franche-Comté</region><region type="old region" nuts="2">Franche-Comté</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université de Franche-Comté</orgName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Anota, Amelie" sort="Anota, Amelie" uniqKey="Anota A" first="Amélie" last="Anota">Amélie Anota</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bredart, Anne" sort="Bredart, Anne" uniqKey="Bredart A" first="Anne" last="Brédart">Anne Brédart</name></author><author><name sortKey="Monnier, Alain" sort="Monnier, Alain" uniqKey="Monnier A" first="Alain" last="Monnier">Alain Monnier</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bosset, Jean Francois" sort="Bosset, Jean Francois" uniqKey="Bosset J" first="Jean-François" last="Bosset">Jean-François Bosset</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mercier, Mariette" sort="Mercier, Mariette" uniqKey="Mercier M" first="Mariette" last="Mercier">Mariette Mercier</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">BMC cancer</title><idno type="eISSN">1471-2407</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Aged, 80 and over (MeSH)</term><term>Ambulatory Care (MeSH)</term><term>Chi-Square Distribution (MeSH)</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>France (MeSH)</term><term>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Linear Models (MeSH)</term><term>Longitudinal Studies (MeSH)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Markov Chains (MeSH)</term><term>Medical Oncology (methods)</term><term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Monte Carlo Method (MeSH)</term><term>Multivariate Analysis (MeSH)</term><term>Neoplasms (diagnosis)</term><term>Neoplasms (psychology)</term><term>Neoplasms (therapy)</term><term>Patient Satisfaction (MeSH)</term><term>Patients (psychology)</term><term>Perception (MeSH)</term><term>Physician-Patient Relations (MeSH)</term><term>Prospective Studies (MeSH)</term><term>Quality of Life (MeSH)</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires (MeSH)</term><term>Time Factors (MeSH)</term><term>Treatment Outcome (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH)</term><term>Analyse multifactorielle (MeSH)</term><term>Chaines de Markov (MeSH)</term><term>Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé (MeSH)</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires (MeSH)</term><term>Facteurs temps (MeSH)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>France (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Loi du khi-deux (MeSH)</term><term>Modèles linéaires (MeSH)</term><term>Mâle (MeSH)</term><term>Méthode de Monte Carlo (MeSH)</term><term>Oncologie médicale (méthodes)</term><term>Patients (psychologie)</term><term>Perception (MeSH)</term><term>Qualité de vie (MeSH)</term><term>Relations médecin-patient (MeSH)</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique (MeSH)</term><term>Satisfaction des patients (MeSH)</term><term>Soins ambulatoires (MeSH)</term><term>Sujet âgé (MeSH)</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus (MeSH)</term><term>Tumeurs (diagnostic)</term><term>Tumeurs (psychologie)</term><term>Tumeurs (thérapie)</term><term>Études longitudinales (MeSH)</term><term>Études prospectives (MeSH)</term><term>Études transversales (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>France</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en"><term>Neoplasms</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Tumeurs</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Medical Oncology</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Oncologie médicale</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Patients</term><term>Tumeurs</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Neoplasms</term><term>Patients</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="therapy" xml:lang="en"><term>Neoplasms</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="thérapie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Tumeurs</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Ambulatory Care</term><term>Chi-Square Distribution</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term><term>Female</term><term>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</term><term>Humans</term><term>Linear Models</term><term>Longitudinal Studies</term><term>Male</term><term>Markov Chains</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Monte Carlo Method</term><term>Multivariate Analysis</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Perception</term><term>Physician-Patient Relations</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Quality of Life</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse multifactorielle</term><term>Chaines de Markov</term><term>Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term><term>Facteurs temps</term><term>Femelle</term><term>France</term><term>Humains</term><term>Loi du khi-deux</term><term>Modèles linéaires</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Méthode de Monte Carlo</term><term>Perception</term><term>Qualité de vie</term><term>Relations médecin-patient</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Satisfaction des patients</term><term>Soins ambulatoires</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Études longitudinales</term><term>Études prospectives</term><term>Études transversales</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>France</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>In the oncology setting, there has been increasing interest in evaluating treatment outcomes in terms of quality of life and patient satisfaction. The aim of our study was to investigate the determinants of patient satisfaction, especially the relationship between quality of life and satisfaction with care and their changes over time, in curative treatment of cancer outpatients.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>Patients undergoing ambulatory chemotherapy or radiotherapy in two centers in France were invited to complete the OUT-PATSAT35, at the beginning of treatment, at the end of treatment, and three months after treatment. This questionnaire evaluates patients' perception of doctors and nurses, as well as other aspects of care organization and services. Additionally, for each patient, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and self-reported quality of life data (EORTC QLQ-C30) were collected.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>Of the 691 patients initially included, 561 answered the assessment at all three time points. By cross-sectional analysis, at the end of the treatment, patients who experienced a deterioration of their global health reported less satisfaction on most scales (p ≤ 0.001). Three months after treatment, the same patients had lower satisfaction scores only in the evaluation of doctors (p ≤ 0.002). Furthermore, longitudinal analysis showed a significant relationship between a deterioration in global health and a decrease in satisfaction with their doctor and, conversely, between an improvement in global health and an increase in satisfaction on the overall satisfaction scale. Global health at baseline was largely and significantly associated with all satisfaction scores measured at the following assessment time points (p < 0.0001). Younger age (<55 years), radiotherapy (versus chemotherapy) and head and neck cancer (versus other localizations) were clinical factors significantly associated with less satisfaction on most scales evaluating doctors.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p><p>Pre-treatment self-evaluated global health was found to be the major determinant of patient satisfaction with care. The subsequent deterioration of global health, during and after treatment, emphasized the decrease in satisfaction scores, mainly in the evaluation of doctors. Early initiatives aimed at improving the delivery of care in patients with poor health status should lead to improved perception of the quality of care received.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24460858</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1471-2407</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>14</Volume><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>Jan</Month><Day>25</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>BMC cancer</Title><ISOAbbreviation>BMC Cancer</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A longitudinal analysis of patient satisfaction with care and quality of life in ambulatory oncology based on the OUT-PATSAT35 questionnaire.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>42</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1186/1471-2407-14-42</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">In the oncology setting, there has been increasing interest in evaluating treatment outcomes in terms of quality of life and patient satisfaction. The aim of our study was to investigate the determinants of patient satisfaction, especially the relationship between quality of life and satisfaction with care and their changes over time, in curative treatment of cancer outpatients.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Patients undergoing ambulatory chemotherapy or radiotherapy in two centers in France were invited to complete the OUT-PATSAT35, at the beginning of treatment, at the end of treatment, and three months after treatment. This questionnaire evaluates patients' perception of doctors and nurses, as well as other aspects of care organization and services. Additionally, for each patient, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and self-reported quality of life data (EORTC QLQ-C30) were collected.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Of the 691 patients initially included, 561 answered the assessment at all three time points. By cross-sectional analysis, at the end of the treatment, patients who experienced a deterioration of their global health reported less satisfaction on most scales (p ≤ 0.001). Three months after treatment, the same patients had lower satisfaction scores only in the evaluation of doctors (p ≤ 0.002). Furthermore, longitudinal analysis showed a significant relationship between a deterioration in global health and a decrease in satisfaction with their doctor and, conversely, between an improvement in global health and an increase in satisfaction on the overall satisfaction scale. Global health at baseline was largely and significantly associated with all satisfaction scores measured at the following assessment time points (p < 0.0001). Younger age (<55 years), radiotherapy (versus chemotherapy) and head and neck cancer (versus other localizations) were clinical factors significantly associated with less satisfaction on most scales evaluating doctors.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Pre-treatment self-evaluated global health was found to be the major determinant of patient satisfaction with care. The subsequent deterioration of global health, during and after treatment, emphasized the decrease in satisfaction scores, mainly in the evaluation of doctors. Early initiatives aimed at improving the delivery of care in patients with poor health status should lead to improved perception of the quality of care received.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Nguyen</LastName><ForeName>Thanh Vân France</ForeName><Initials>TV</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Clinical Research Department, EA 3181, Université de Franche Comté, Besançon 25030, France. nguyen_france@yahoo.fr.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Anota</LastName><ForeName>Amélie</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Brédart</LastName><ForeName>Anne</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Monnier</LastName><ForeName>Alain</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bosset</LastName><ForeName>Jean-François</ForeName><Initials>JF</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mercier</LastName><ForeName>Mariette</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016448">Multicenter Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>25</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>BMC Cancer</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100967800</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1471-2407</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000553" MajorTopicYN="Y">Ambulatory Care</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016009" MajorTopicYN="N">Chi-Square Distribution</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003430" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Sectional Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005602" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">France</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007722" MajorTopicYN="N">Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016014" MajorTopicYN="N">Linear Models</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008137" MajorTopicYN="N">Longitudinal Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008390" MajorTopicYN="N">Markov Chains</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008495" MajorTopicYN="N">Medical Oncology</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009010" MajorTopicYN="N">Monte Carlo Method</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015999" MajorTopicYN="N">Multivariate Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009369" MajorTopicYN="N">Neoplasms</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000175" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnosis</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000628" MajorTopicYN="Y">therapy</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010361" MajorTopicYN="N">Patients</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010465" MajorTopicYN="N">Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010817" MajorTopicYN="N">Physician-Patient Relations</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011788" MajorTopicYN="Y">Quality of Life</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="Y">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2013</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>30</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24460858</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">1471-2407-14-42</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/1471-2407-14-42</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3922727</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Oral Oncol. 2005 May;41(5):440-54</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15878748</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Clin Oncol. 2004 Feb 15;22(4):714-24</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14966096</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Cancer. 2007;7:129</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17634110</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Eur J Cancer. 2007 Jan;43(2):323-30</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17156997</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Psychooncology. 2010 Jun;19(6):657-64</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19771588</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Apr;87(4):271-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19551235</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bull Cancer. 2006 Mar 1;93(3):315-27</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16567319</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Curr Opin Oncol. 2005 Jul;17(4):351-4</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15933466</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>JAMA. 2002 Dec 18;288(23):3027-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12479768</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Cancer. 2011;11:526</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22204665</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 1996 Jun;42(11):1511-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8771634</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov 1;22(21):4401-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15514382</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cancer. 1984 May 15;53(10 Suppl):2366-75</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6704916</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Med Care. 1993 Jan;31(1):84-94</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8417273</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jul;44(11):1559-65</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18430563</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Qual Life Res. 1997 May;6(4):293-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9248311</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Psychooncology. 2005 May;14(5):408-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15386757</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Jun;13(6):817-22</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16614882</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Aug;10(4):311-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9835247</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(7):903-18</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7792630</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Acta Oncol. 2006;45(5):550-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16864168</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:84</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17074085</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 1997 Dec;45(12):1829-43</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9447632</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(9):1351-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9783878</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004;(32):9-16</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15263035</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:190</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19845942</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Aug;18(4):266-74</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16809400</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9440735</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cancer. 2008 Aug 1;113(3):628-37</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18543317</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD003751</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23543521</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Support Care Cancer. 2012 Dec;20(12):3269-78</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22549507</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Psychooncology. 2004 Apr;13(4):223-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15054727</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009 Nov 03;3:287-304</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19936172</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Feb;52(2):131-41</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15132517</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Health Psychol. 1998 Jan;17(1):70-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9459073</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cancer. 1990 Aug 1;66(3):610-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2364373</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Aug;15(4):337-44</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12930049</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(10):1253-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1835594</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Support Care Cancer. 2005 May;13(5):303-10</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15729552</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Med Care. 2007 May;45(5):394-400</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17446825</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Support Care Cancer. 2004 Oct;12(10):692-700</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15258839</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Australas Radiol. 2006 Oct;50(5):455-62</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16981943</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Psychosom Res. 1999 Mar;46(3):241-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10193914</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Support Care Cancer. 2008 Jun;16(6):567-75</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18322707</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>France</li></country><region><li>Bourgogne-Franche-Comté</li><li>Franche-Comté</li></region><orgName><li>Université de Franche-Comté</li></orgName></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Anota, Amelie" sort="Anota, Amelie" uniqKey="Anota A" first="Amélie" last="Anota">Amélie Anota</name><name sortKey="Bosset, Jean Francois" sort="Bosset, Jean Francois" uniqKey="Bosset J" first="Jean-François" last="Bosset">Jean-François Bosset</name><name sortKey="Bredart, Anne" sort="Bredart, Anne" uniqKey="Bredart A" first="Anne" last="Brédart">Anne Brédart</name><name sortKey="Mercier, Mariette" sort="Mercier, Mariette" uniqKey="Mercier M" first="Mariette" last="Mercier">Mariette Mercier</name><name sortKey="Monnier, Alain" sort="Monnier, Alain" uniqKey="Monnier A" first="Alain" last="Monnier">Alain Monnier</name></noCountry><country name="France"><region name="Bourgogne-Franche-Comté"><name sortKey="Nguyen, Thanh Van France" sort="Nguyen, Thanh Van France" uniqKey="Nguyen T" first="Thanh Vân France" last="Nguyen">Thanh Vân France Nguyen</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/AutomedicationFrancoV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001351 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001351 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= AutomedicationFrancoV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24460858
|texte= A longitudinal analysis of patient satisfaction with care and quality of life in ambulatory oncology based on the OUT-PATSAT35 questionnaire.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24460858" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a AutomedicationFrancoV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |